By I think the word ‘wave’ was probably one of the first things that came to mind when reading the title. I think the term ‘freshbooks’ originally meant “free and easy” and the term ‘wave’ originally meant a “wave of positive energy”. I think those things are pretty accurate so I didn’t know where to begin.
I dont think it’s that simple. Freshbooks was the predecessor to the internet and wave is the internet. Both are created through the same underlying purpose of generating positive energy but they are very different things. Freshbooks was created to be free – basically its a “donation box” where you can give your money to someone in need, this is similar to the World Giving Project.
Freshbooks is a free service where you give to people in need on the internet, essentially if you spend a certain amount of money you are put into a small box with a note saying you need money and you can come back and get it. You can then use that money to donate to people in need.
I think the Freshbooks service is incredibly similar to World Giving. You can give to anyone, everywhere. That is an excellent idea as well, especially if you want to do it with a small amount of money. I wonder if the two services have anything in common besides the ability to make a small donation to anyone else.
I wish that we could have been asked a question about Wave. This is the project which will make it possible for us to donate money to anyone anywhere. Basically, I’m wondering if there are any big differences between Wave and Freshbooks.
Wave is an online service that you can give to anyone, anywhere in the world. It’s been around for a few years now, and it’s been funded by Kickstarter for a few years now. The main difference between Wave and Freshbooks is that Wave lets you give money to anyone, anywhere, without the need to check your email, fill out a form or even upload any data.
I’m not sure what the big difference between Wave and Freshbooks is. Both companies are based in the US, and both have their sights set on becoming the go-to-service for online donations. The two companies are even funded by the same people. I’m not sure how I feel about this, but if there’s something major we can learn from either, I’d love to see it.
Im not sure what Freshbooks can teach us. Maybe a better use of your time and money, or perhaps saving someone from death? If it’s the latter, then it’s not a bad idea. Whether it’s the latter idea or the former, I’d love to see it.
The idea of donating to a company with a different legal structure than the US government, in the hopes that a government-sponsored program will save the lives of the poor, or whatever – is one of the greatest nightmares of the internet. The internet in general has become so large, so intertwined, that it’s hard to imagine it could be turned back on its own.
But it can be turned on its own. And for the record, it can be turned back on itself. This is why, in the age of the internet, it’s a good idea to donate to those who are in need. But not just because its a good idea.
